CNN Article:
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/12/07/us.middle.east.talks/index.html?hpt=T2\
Aljazeera Article:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/articles/34/US-stops-urging-settlement-freeze.html
Both articles deal with the US ceasing to ask Israel to extend its moratorium (essentially a hiatus) on continuing settlement plans in the West Bank. Both cite the US administrations statement that they had realized that this basis for negotiation was not the best way to continue peace talks and both cite the Palestinian government's refusal to continue negotiations as long as Israel continued its plans to build.
The CNN article is noticeably longer, mentioning more historical facts such as previous agreements between Israel and Pakistan, as well as including more statements from Palestinian officials than does the Aljazeera article. The Aljazeera article also differs in that it refers to the West Bank as "occupied Palestinian lands," whereas the CNN article simply refers to it as the "occupied West Bank." In general, the article written by the Middle Eastern source seems to support the Palestinian administration, seeming to show the statements made as justified demands. The CNN article puts those same statements in an ominous light, saying that "an Israeli plan to build more than 600 new housing units in East Jerusalem could be the "last nail in the coffin of the peace process."" The CNN article also puts the US into more of a benevolent role as the mediator striving for peace.
